A Nation within a Nation? Assessing Afro-American Under/development From An Ethnic And Economic Standpoint
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-4555.2016.00009.7Keywords:
African-American, Development, Empirical, GDP, Ethnogeriatic, Marginalised, Black PowerAbstract
African-Americans constitute for just 13% of the population of the United States of America, but their contribution to the nation's real GDP is around one point two trillion USD as on 2008. Ever since their arrival in the New World as slaves, they have not been given their due share; thus prompting writers like Komozoi Woodard to title this politics of exclusion and the resultant rise of the Black Power movement and politics as the veritable existence of ‘a nation within a nation’ striving for equal social and economic rights. Studies have been conducted across disciplines that point out the economic and social deterioration of this section of the American population that still faces discrimination on all fronts. The Ethnogeriatic Curriculum Module points out that the death rate from cancer is 30% more in the African-American elderly community than the whites (Gordon “Ethnogeriatic Curriculum Module”), while there is some recent empirical evidence that suggests that there nevertheless has been a pronounced improvement in the lot of this marginalised section; thus, there is data both for and against this view. The proposed paper would like to have a look at both these views and try to gather conclusive evidence if the politics of exclusion that Woodard once spoke of still holds good or not.Downloads
Published
01-Feb-16
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The print version of online journals is the final version. Copying, printing, and saving content is restricted unless agreed otherwise. Commercial reuse requires permission from the society or author. Copyright remains with the society/author. DE is not liable for any consequences from using the information.
How to Cite
A Nation within a Nation? Assessing Afro-American Under/development From An Ethnic And Economic Standpoint. (2016). Journal of Exclusion Studies, 6(1), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-4555.2016.00009.7